Re: [Military Environmental Forum] Mw 26i -- PRP Plutonium results from two different seasons, March and May 2001 & 1, 4 Dioxane area??

On Thursday, June 25, 2026 at 02:05:17 PM EDT, crborello@aol.com <crborello@aol.com> wrote:

TO: US EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin..... Re: Uniontown IEL Superfund Site additional supporting documentation concerning the matter of the 2004 sealing of IEL landfill monitoring wells, showing evidence of Plutonium reported in PRPs own testing conducted in 2000/01 ...

On Saturday, March 23, 2024 at 12:03:29 PM EDT, crborello@aol.com <crborello@aol.com> wrote:

:TO: US EPA CHIEF ENFORCEMENT, David Uhlmann

and

CDC/ATSDR, Assistant Director, Dr. Chris Reh

Subject: Crucial evidence offsite destroyed? - GONE as of 2004: Monitoring Well 26 i (located west/NW across street from landfill, in a densely populated residential neighborhood , and the 1, 4 Dioxane Plume.

*** These PRP lab- generated plutonium results attached below, were in fact declared "valid" by US EPA NAREL , collected March and May of 2001 rounds...

Yet, this monitoring well then was sealed up, along with some 32 other test wells - , despite the attached letter sent, major newspaper editorials ( to follow this email) questioning the sealing ( i.e, and destruction of potential criminal evidence related to illegal disposal of nuclear wastes..)

From the very scant EPA information currently being allowed out to the public domain, it appears that indeed, the 1, 4 Dioxane plume, being studied by PRPs for EPA, happens to be in this same vicinity of test well MW26 i...Thus, perhaps you can appreciate the outrage, not only about that well being sealed back in 2004,, preventing any future examination at that particular depth and direction, but why citizens are questioning precisely why EPA, CDC/ATSDR, et al are deferring to the Ohio Dept. of Health and Stark health dept. under the following circumstances ( baggage?):

Specifically citizens would like to know:

Why are the health depts."in the driver seat" on the 1, 4 Dioxane, with our Dioxane victims even being threatened legally, to force them to seal up their wells, pull up their pumps, disconnect from their homes, etc. etc,

specifically given what the polluters' attorney had quizzed former landfill owner, Charles Kittinger, during the depositions on the Army disposal of Plutonium at IEL, quzzing Kittinger about the role Stark health dept.'s Dopler may have played ?

Most interestingly, when citizens then contacted contacted a former local former County official believed to be very much"in the know " , who was friends of Mr. Doplers/Stark H.D.) ...They vehemently countered :" Don't blame Dopler/ Stark Health Dept., saying "a directive" had been issued to the Stark H.D. from Ohio Department of Health, to allow the additional materials at IEL!"

Note: Also see May, 2001 test wells MW 23 s, MW 1 etc., Pu findings. These test wells remain, to our knowledge, open and available for proper Pu testing : I.e, according to DOE's Sill/RESL lab, preserved immediately, adequate volumes collected, proper Low Flow conducted prior to prevent stagnant water samples that can allow loss of evidence; and the lab using proper Pu analysis used at RESL. and NOT EPA's Finished Drinking Water 900 methods, never meant for man-mades, and def. not for Pu...., with a min. of 16 hours counted, vs the 2 hours employed by the PRP's lab in 2000/01, that reportedly, drove up the "uncertainty levels" ( conveniently !)...

CCLT/Uniontown IEL Superfund Site, OH

From:	crborello--- via Military-cpeo <military-cpeo@lists.sonic.net>
Date:	Thu, 25 Jun 2026 13:18:25 -0700 (PDT)
Reply:	cpeo-military
Subject:	Re: [Military Environmental Forum] Mw 26i -- PRP Plutonium results from two different seasons, March and May 2001 & 1, 4 Dioxane area??

On Thursday, June 25, 2026 at 02:05:17 PM EDT, crborello@aol.com <crborello@aol.com> wrote: TO: US EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin..... Re: Uniontown IEL Superfund Site additional supporting documentation concerning the matter of the 2004 sealing of IEL landfill monitoring wells, showing evidence of Plutonium reported in PRPs own testing conducted in 2000/01 ... On Saturday, March 23, 2024 at 12:03:29 PM EDT, crborello@aol.com <crborello@aol.com> wrote: :TO: US EPA CHIEF ENFORCEMENT, David Uhlmann and CDC/ATSDR, Assistant Director, Dr. Chris Reh Subject: Crucial evidence offsite destroyed? - GONE as of 2004: Monitoring Well 26 i (located west/NW across street from landfill, in a densely populated residential neighborhood , and the 1, 4 Dioxane Plume. ***** These PRP lab- generated plutonium results attached below, were in fact declared "valid" by U**S EPA NAREL , collected March and May of 2001 rounds... Yet, this monitoring well then was sealed up, along with some 32 other test wells - , despite the attached letter sent, major newspaper editorials ( to follow this email) questioning the sealing ( i.e, and destruction of potential criminal evidence related to illegal disposal of nuclear wastes..) From the very scant EPA information currently being allowed out to the public domain, it appears that indeed, the 1, 4 Dioxane plume, being studied by PRPs for EPA, happens to be in this same vicinity of test well MW26 i...Thus, perhaps you can appreciate the outrage, not only about that well being sealed back in 2004,, preventing any future examination at that particular depth and direction, but why citizens are questioning precisely why *EPA, CDC/ATSDR, et al are deferring to the Ohio Dept. of Health and Stark health dept. under the following circumstances ( baggage?):* Specifically citizens would like to know: Why are the health depts."in the driver seat" on the 1, 4 Dioxane, with our Dioxane victims even being threatened legally, to force them to seal up their wells, pull up their pumps, disconnect from their homes, etc. etc, specifically given what the polluters' attorney had quizzed former landfill owner, Charles Kittinger, during the depositions on the Army disposal of Plutonium at IEL, quzzing Kittinger about the role Stark health dept.'s Dopler may have played ? Most interestingly, when citizens then contacted contacted a former local former County official believed to be very much"in the know " , who was friends of Mr. Doplers/Stark H.D.) ...They vehemently countered :" Don't blame Dopler/ Stark Health Dept., saying "a directive" had been issued to the Stark H.D. from Ohio Department of Health, to allow the additional materials at IEL!" . Note: Also see May, 2001 test wells MW 23 s, MW 1 etc., Pu findings. These test wells remain, to our knowledge, open and available for proper Pu testing : I.e, according to DOE's Sill/RESL lab, preserved immediately, adequate volumes collected, proper Low Flow conducted prior to prevent stagnant water samples that can allow loss of evidence; and the lab using proper Pu analysis used at RESL. and NOT EPA's Finished Drinking Water 900 methods, never meant for man-mades, and def. not for Pu...., with a min. of 16 hours counted, vs the 2 hours employed by the PRP's lab in 2000/01, that reportedly, drove up the "uncertainty levels" ( conveniently !)... CCLT/Uniontown IEL Superfund Site, OH Attachment: `IMG_1968.jpg` Description: JPEG image Attachment: `IMG_1969.jpg` Description: JPEG image Attachment: `IMG_1970.jpg` Description: JPEG image Attachment: `IMG_1971.jpg` Description: JPEG image Attachment: `IMG_1972.jpg` Description: JPEG image Attachment: `IMG_1973.jpg` Description: JPEG image Attachment: `IMG_1974.jpg` Description: JPEG image -- Military-cpeo mailing list Military-cpeo@lists.sonic.net https://lists.sonic.net/mailman/listinfo/military-cpeo
	Prev by Date: [Military Environmental Forum] RADIATION, REUSE: "Protest Targets SF Housing Plans at Contaminated Hunters Point Naval Shipyard, " San Francisco, CA Next by Date: [Military Environmental Forum] FUEL: "Distrust, Uncertainty as Navy Moves to Reopen Red Hill [HI] Well"
	Prev by Thread: [Military Environmental Forum] RADIATION, REUSE: "Protest Targets SF Housing Plans at Contaminated Hunters Point Naval Shipyard, " San Francisco, CA Next by Thread: [Military Environmental Forum] FUEL: "Distrust, Uncertainty as Navy Moves to Reopen Red Hill [HI] Well"