| From: | Lenny Siegel <Lsiegel@cpeo.org> |
| Date: | Thu, 25 Jun 2026 13:40:04 -0700 (PDT) |
| Reply: | cpeo-military |
| Subject: | [Military Environmental Forum] FUEL: "Distrust, Uncertainty as Navy Moves to Reopen Red Hill [HI] Well" |
Distrust, Uncertainty as Navy Moves to Reopen Red Hill Well The service faces ongoing skepticism over its insistence the water will be safe to drink. By Kevin Knodell Originally published by The Honolulu Star-Advertiser (HI) June 24, 2026 xAs the Navy continues to move forward with plans to reopen its Red Hill well and reconnect it to its Oahu water system five years after it was contaminated with jet fuel, the service faces ongoing skepticism over its insistence the water will be safe to drink. The Navy released its environmental assessment for its planned Red Hill Water Treatment Facility this month with a “finding of no significant impact” for the project — or FONSI — issued May 26 by Rear Adm. B.J. Collins, commander of Navy Region Hawaii. The FONSI said that reconnecting the Red Hill water shaft will “restore it as a drinking water source to provide adequate resiliency and redundancy to the Navy’s drinking water system for consumers and multiple Department of War operations at Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam.” … For the entire article, see https://www.military.com/distrust-uncertainty-as-navy-moves-to-reopen-red-hill-well See also https://spectrumlocalnews.com/hi/hawaii/news/2026/06/24/feds-issue--17m-in-red-hill-settlement-payments — Lenny Siegel Executive Director Center for Public Environmental Oversight A project of the Pacific Studies Center LSiegel@cpeo.org P.O. Box 998, Mountain View, CA 94042 Voice/Fax: 650-961-8918 http://www.cpeo.org Author: DISTURBING THE WAR: The Inside Story of the Movement to Get Stanford University out of Southeast Asia - 1965–1975 (See http://a3mreunion.org) -- Military-cpeo mailing list Military-cpeo@lists.sonic.net https://lists.sonic.net/mailman/listinfo/military-cpeo | |
|
Prev by Date: Re: [Military Environmental Forum] Mw 26i -- PRP Plutonium results from two different seasons, March and May 2001 & 1, 4 Dioxane area?? Next by Date: [CPEO-MEF] PFAS: Talks between New Mexico and Air Force | |
|
Prev by Thread: Re: [Military Environmental Forum] Mw 26i -- PRP Plutonium results from two different seasons, March and May 2001 & 1, 4 Dioxane area?? Next by Thread: [CPEO-MEF] PFAS: Talks between New Mexico and Air Force | |