|From:||Lenny Siegel <email@example.com>|
|Date:||Mon, 6 Feb 2012 18:27:06 -0800 (PST)|
|Subject:||[CPEO-MEF] ENERGY: "Why the Military Hates Fossil Fuels": Part 2|
Why the Military Hates Fossil Fuels: Part Two, Alternatives Amy Westervelt Forbes February 6, 2012Last week this series started off with a look at why the military wants to reduce its dependence on fossil fuels and some of the ways in which it plans to do that. Today we'll take a closer look at some of the specific technologies and products the military is pursuing and the various plans in place for making it all work.
Again, the military's interest in clean technology and renewable energy, while certainly supported by federal policy, seems to be more about resource efficiency than any particular political agenda. And while the Solyndra debacle has had everyone complaining about the Department of Energy‘s loan guarantee program, when it comes to military projects the business case is very different.
... For the entire article, seehttp://www.forbes.com/sites/amywestervelt/2012/02/06/why-the-military- hates-fossil-fuels-part-two-alternatives/
-- Lenny Siegel Executive Director, Center for Public Environmental Oversight a project of the Pacific Studies Center 278-A Hope St., Mountain View, CA 94041 Voice: 650/961-8918 or 650/969-1545 Fax: 650/961-8918 <firstname.lastname@example.org> http://www.cpeo.org _______________________________________________ Military mailing list Military@lists.cpeo.org http://lists.cpeo.org/listinfo.cgi/military-cpeo.org
Prev by Date: [CPEO-MEF] CLOSURE: "BRAC cleanup costs linger long after installations close"|
Next by Date: [CPEO-MEF] REUSE: Walter Reed plan on way to DC Council
Prev by Thread: [CPEO-MEF] CLOSURE: "BRAC cleanup costs linger long after installations close"|
Next by Thread: [CPEO-MEF] REUSE: Walter Reed plan on way to DC Council