|Date:||26 Nov 2002 19:47:21 -0000|
|Subject:||Re: [CPEO-MEF] What is wrong with the way the RAB's are set up?|
Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2002 14:43:44 EST Message-ID: <firstname.lastname@example.org> Errors-To: <email@example.com> X-Topica-Id: <1038339846.inmta006.16968.1017916> Return-Path: <StellaVB@aol.com> Received: (qmail 24732 invoked by alias); 26 Nov 2002 19:44:04 -0000 Received: (qmail 24727 invoked by uid 0); 26 Nov 2002 19:44:04 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO imo-r04.mx.aol.com) (188.8.131.52) by 0 with SMTP; 26 Nov 2002 19:44:04 -0000 Received: from StellaVB@aol.com by imo-r04.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v34.13.) id 2.a6.302f5145 (18707); Tue, 26 Nov 2002 14:43:44 -0500 (EST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Thank you Diane for that assessment, which I believe to be quite accurate and a part of the big picture! Stella ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Prev by Date: [CPEO-MEF] MAKING A FUTURE PARK SAFE|
Next by Date: [CPEO-MEF] Army misses some lessons from Tooele chemical weapons incinerator
Prev by Thread: RE: [CPEO-MEF] What is wrong with the way the RAB's are set up?|
Next by Thread: [CPEO-MEF] What is wrong with the way the RAB's are set up?