|Date:||4 May 2001 18:13:08 -0000|
|Subject:||RE: [CPEO-BIF] Questions and concerns?|
Ms. Coffins's point is well taken, but a point to be made about social justice is that redevelopment in the most desperate areas is hindered by much more than real or perceived environmental impairments. Greenfields in many of the most desperate neighborhoods may never get developed. Remember that major redevelopment is often coupled with gentrification and other social justice issues. As far as Demonstration pilots are concerned, the EPA has chosen to demonstrate that brownfield redevelopment can be successful in generating sustainable industry; creating case studies that municipalities and decision makers can cite in creating policies to further clean up additional sites. i.e.. the Unanimously approved Senate Bill, which will provide additional funds and opportunities for communities to address a greater number of brownfields. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ To read CPEO's archived Brownfields messages visit http://www.cpeo.org/lists/brownfields If this email has been forwarded to you and you'd like to subscribe, please send a message to firstname.lastname@example.org ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ==^================================================================ EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://igc.topica.com/u/?aVxieR.aVGyPL Or send an email To: email@example.com This email was sent to: firstname.lastname@example.org T O P I C A -- Learn More. Surf Less. Newsletters, Tips and Discussions on Topics You Choose. http://www.topica.com/partner/tag01 ==^================================================================
Prev by Date: Re: [CPEO-BIF] Questions and concerns?|
Next by Date: Re: [CPEO-BIF] Cherry vs. Inner City Sites
Prev by Thread: Re: [CPEO-BIF] Questions and concerns?|
Next by Thread: RE: [CPEO-BIF] Questions and concerns?