|From:||Lenny Siegel <LSiegel@cpeo.org>|
|Date:||Thu, 22 Dec 2011 14:19:39 -0800 (PST)|
|Subject:||[CPEO-MEF] REUSE, PRESERVATION: Condition Analysis and Rehabilitation Plan for Hangar One, Moffett Field (CA)|
NASA report: New Hangar One skin cheaper than demolition Mountain View Voice (CA) December 22, 2011Congress take note: a new NASA report says that demolishing Moffett Field icon Hangar One is more costly than replacing its toxic siding.
Pleasantly surprising preservationists, the Condition Analysis and Rehabilitation Plan for Hangar One, released Dec. 16, puts the cost of demolishing Hangar One at $44.4 million, while doing the bare minimum to save the hangar, installing a new skin, would cost $40.7 million.
The report's "findings are good for the hangar's future," said Lenny Siegel, leader of the Save Hangar One Committee in an email. "Not only does demolition not make historical sense, it would actually cost more money than making the building watertight."
... For the entire article, see http://www.mv-voice.com/news/show_story.php?id=5089&e=y -- Lenny Siegel Executive Director, Center for Public Environmental Oversight a project of the Pacific Studies Center 278-A Hope St., Mountain View, CA 94041 Voice: 650/961-8918 or 650/969-1545 Fax: 650/961-8918 <firstname.lastname@example.org> http://www.cpeo.org _______________________________________________ Military mailing list Military@lists.cpeo.org http://lists.cpeo.org/listinfo.cgi/military-cpeo.org
Prev by Date: [CPEO-MEF] REUSE: Redstone Arsenal (AL) perchlorate and TCE|
Next by Date: [CPEO-MEF] FUEL: Yuma Marine Corps Air Station (AZ) estimates size of leak
Prev by Thread: [CPEO-MEF] REUSE: Redstone Arsenal (AL) perchlorate and TCE|
Next by Thread: [CPEO-MEF] FUEL: Yuma Marine Corps Air Station (AZ) estimates size of leak