|From:||Lenny Siegel <LSiegel@cpeo.org>|
|Date:||Wed, 13 Jul 2011 08:42:36 -0700 (PDT)|
|Subject:||[CPEO-MEF] DIOXANE: Who pays for treatment at Tucson (AZ) Airport?|
Treatment plant for groundwater a Tucson priority Editorial Arizona Daily Star July 13, 2011The city of Tucson and its water utility are correctly taking the lead by spending $10 million to build a new treatment plant to remove a dangerous carcinogen from south-side groundwater.
Though Tucson Water and the city aren't responsible for the contamination of the aquifer and ought not to pay the costs of the cleanup, the priority has to be providing safe drinking water, as Deputy City Manager Richard Miranda told the Star's editorial board last week.
Sorting out who pays can come later. ... For the entire editorial, seehttp://azstarnet.com/news/opinion/editorial/ article_f2d4620f-2f46-58a1-8c27-1e2ba8a69f0c.html
-- Lenny Siegel Executive Director, Center for Public Environmental Oversight a project of the Pacific Studies Center 278-A Hope St., Mountain View, CA 94041 Voice: 650/961-8918 or 650/969-1545 Fax: 650/961-8918 <email@example.com> http://www.cpeo.org _______________________________________________ Military mailing list Military@lists.cpeo.org http://lists.cpeo.org/listinfo.cgi/military-cpeo.org
Prev by Date: [CPEO-MEF] PERCHLORATE: GAO faults standard-setting process during Bush Administration|
Next by Date: [CPEO-MEF] REUSE: Mixed ruling on Hunters Point Shipyard (CA) redevelopment
Prev by Thread: [CPEO-MEF] PERCHLORATE: GAO faults standard-setting process during Bush Administration|
Next by Thread: [CPEO-MEF] REUSE: Mixed ruling on Hunters Point Shipyard (CA) redevelopment