|From:||Peter Strauss <firstname.lastname@example.org>|
|Date:||Wed, 23 Sep 2009 18:35:55 -0700 (PDT)|
|Subject:||Re: [CPEO-MEF] HEALTH, VOCs: NRC releases Camp Lejeune report|
This is an interesting conclusion, and I'm sure disturbing for some.
What I take away from this is that the best scientists have little
ways to " back track" the dosage of contaminants received over many
years, because of uncertainty in the amount that was spilled and the
amount that would be ingested because of not understanding the full
scope of all the transport mechanisms, including soil to water,
dilution, degradation, water and soil to air. I can understand their
dilemma, for it is a complicated set of data. Ironically, however,
the same types of data are routinely used to express risk well into
the future. I would say that you either distrust the conclusion
about Camp Lejeune, or you distrust models that show that a
contaminated plume will have no risk to future users of a water supply.
It is interesting that as a Technical Advisor to a community group in the mid-1990's, I was faced with a similar situation. I'm referring to AFB 44, which contaminated the City of Tucson's water supply as far back as the early 1950's. ATSDR performed an analysis of all the data, and they concluded people off-site of the property would not have ingested water in concentrations enough to exceed the Safe Drinking Water Act MCL of 5 ppb (TCE). However, they only looked at 1990 monitoring data, and did not take into consideration factors such as natural degradation, vapor transport etc. Meanwhile there was and still remains a wealth of information about the individuals that contracted disease.
A positive thing that EPA did during this process was to fund a TCE clinic, which was set up in a nearby school. Persons who thought they were were injured from ingesting TCE (those closest to the water supply wells that were not diluted) could go to the clinic, have a cursory examination, after which they were referred to a doctor. This documented symptoms, and was a first step in getting medical treatment.
Peter Strauss PM Strauss & Associates San Francisco, CA 415-647-4404 On Jun 14, 2009, at 6:17 PM, Lenny Siegel wrote:
For immediate release National Research Council (National Academies of Science) June 13, 2009Scientific Evidence of Health Problems From Past Contamination of Drinking Water at Camp Lejeune Is Limited and Unlikely to Be Resolved With Further StudyWASHINGTON -- Evidence exists that people who lived or worked at Camp Lejeune Marine Base in North Carolina between the 1950s and 1985 were exposed to the industrial solvents tricholorethylene (TCE) or perchloroethylene (PCE) in their water supply, but strong scientific evidence is not available to determine whether health problems among those exposed are due to the contaminants, says a new report from the National Research Council. The report adds that further research will unlikely provide definitive information on whether exposure resulted in adverse health effects in most cases. Therefore, policy changes or administrative actions to address and resolve the concerns associated with the exposures should not be deferred pending new or potential health studies."Even with scientific advances, the complex nature of the Camp Lejeune contamination and the limited data on the concentrations in water supplies allow for only crude estimates of exposure," said David Savitz, chair of the committee that wrote the report and professor in the department of community and preventive medicine at Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York City. "Therefore, the committee could not determine reliably whether diseases and disorders experienced by former residents and workers at Camp Lejeune are associated with their exposure to the contaminated water supply."In the early 1980s, two water-supply systems, Tarawa Terrace and Hadnot Point, on Camp Lejeune were found to be contaminated with various toxic industrial solvents, including PCE -- which entered the groundwater as a result of spills and improper disposal practices by an off-base dry cleaner -- and TCE from on-base spills and leaks from underground storage equipment. Considerable public controversy grew over the potential health consequences, such as various cancers, for former residents. To supplement the few studies that have been performed and to help inform decisions about addressing health claims, Congress asked the Research Council to examine whether adverse health effects are associated with past contamination of the water supply at Camp Lejeune.The committee reviewed an extensive water modeling effort of the contamination of Tarawa Terrace, and for Hadnot Point they examined information on chemical contamination from records and disposal practices. PCE was the primary contaminant of the Tarawa Terrace water supply, but the water models could not overcome data gaps to provide accurate estimates of the concentrations of the contaminants. The committee concluded that in the Hadnot Point area, exposures to TCE and PCE occurred, and exposures to several other contaminants through the drinking water distribution system were likely. The ability to determine the levels of exposure at Camp Lejeune was complex, because people could have been exposed at home, school, daycare, or work.In addition to reviewing the studies focusing specifically on Camp Lejeune, the committee examined data on exposures and available scientific research on associations between these chemicals and adverse health effects to determine which health problems might be associated with the Camp Lejeune contaminant exposure. The committee looked at data from two types of studies: epidemiologic and toxicologic. Epidemiologic studies examine whether a group of people with more exposure to particular chemicals have greater frequency of disease than people with lesser or no exposure. Toxicologic studies conduct tests on animals to observe the health effects caused by exposure to chemicals.The epidemiologic studies of TCE and PCE, primarily conducted in workplace settings, contained insufficient evidence to justify causal inference for any health effects. However, the committee found "limited or suggestive evidence of an association" between chronic exposure to TCE, PCE, or a mixture of solvents, and some diseases and disorders, including cancers of the breast, bladder, kidneys, esophagus, and lungs. This categorization means these epidemiologic studies give some reason to be concerned that sufficiently high levels of TCE or PCE may have an adverse effect, but the studies do not provide strong evidence that they actually do.The majority of the health outcomes reviewed in the epidemiologic studies was placed in the category of "inadequate or insufficient evidence," meaning that evidence was of insufficient quantity, quality, or inconclusive in results to make an informed assessment, but that an association between exposure to a specific agent and a health outcome cannot be ruled out. A summary of the conclusions drawn from the epidemiologic studies related to solvent exposure can be found in Box 2 on page 8 of the report. Some health outcomes reported by former residents of the base -- such as male breast cancer and second-generation effects -- are not cited because those specific outcomes were not investigated or the studies were too small or of insufficient quality.The committee also compared information from epidemiologic studies with that from toxicologic studies and found similar health effects in both humans and animals for kidney cancer. Similar noncancerous diseases and disorders included adverse effects on the liver, kidneys, and nervous and immune systems. The findings are in Table 1 on page 10. The absence of other diseases and disorders from Table 1 indicate that the findings were inconsistent between the epidemiologic and toxicologic evidence or were not addressed in the available studies.Studies specifically on the Camp Lejeune population have addressed only reproductive health outcomes, but the limited quality of exposure information restricts their value. The inability to study exposure and health outcomes accurately is a serious limitation in any future research. Thus, the committee concluded that the U.S. Department of the Navy, under which the Marine Corps operates, should not wait for the results of more research before making decisions about how to follow up on the evident contaminant exposures and their possible health consequences. They should undertake appropriate action in light of the available sparse information that indicate exposure to toxic contaminants occurred and may have affected the health of the exposed population.... For the entire press release and a link to the entire report, seehttp://www8.nationalacademies.org/onpinews/newsitem.aspx? RecordID=12618-- Lenny Siegel Executive Director, Center for Public Environmental Oversight a project of the Pacific Studies Center 278-A Hope St., Mountain View, CA 94041 Voice: 650/961-8918 or 650/969-1545 Fax: 650/961-8918 <email@example.com> http://www.cpeo.org _______________________________________________ Military mailing list Military@lists.cpeo.org http://lists.cpeo.org/listinfo.cgi/military-cpeo.org
_______________________________________________ Military mailing list Military@lists.cpeo.org http://lists.cpeo.org/listinfo.cgi/military-cpeo.org
Prev by Date: [CPEO-MEF] PERCHLORATE, MUNITIONS: EPA Releases Drinking Water Contaminant Candidate List|
Next by Date: [CPEO-MEF] REUSE: Obama opposes non-cost transfers
Prev by Thread: Re: [CPEO-MEF] HEALTH, VOCs: NRC releases Camp Lejeune report|
Next by Thread: [CPEO-MEF] ENERGY: Wind turbines proposed for Massachusetts Military Reservation