|From:||Lenny Siegel <email@example.com>|
|Date:||10 Aug 2007 23:50:08 -0000|
|Subject:||[CPEO-MEF] Virginia OLF editorial|
NIMBY not a policy for Navy dealings Editorial The Virginian-Pilot August 10, 2007The pretenses are different, but similarly sacred. In Virginia, opponents have the story of slave rebel Nat Turner. In North Carolina, they have the migration of endangered waterfowl. Add the inviolate causes of property rights and the family farmer, and the siting of a new Navy training field threatens to become impossibly complicated.
Which is, perhaps, the whole point.As the Navy searches for a dark patch of property on which to train pilots, opposition to an outlying landing field - as the facility is formally known - continues to grow in volume, size and organization in both states.
An isolated OLF is crucial if Oceana Naval Air Station is to continue as a master jet base - the place where pilots go to learn how to land on an aircraft carrier. The Fentress auxiliary field, in Chesapeake, is increasingly ill-suited for the kind of constant practice that pilots need.
... For the entire editorial, see http://content.hamptonroads.com/story.cfm?story=130039&ran=38359 -- Lenny Siegel Director, Center for Public Environmental Oversight c/o PSC, 278-A Hope St., Mountain View, CA 94041 Voice: 650/961-8918 or 650/969-1545 Fax: 650/961-8918 <firstname.lastname@example.org> http://www.cpeo.org _______________________________________________ Military mailing list Military@list.cpeo.org http://www.cpeo.org/mailman/listinfo/military
Prev by Date: [CPEO-MEF] Tritium gas release at Anniston Depot (AL)|
Next by Date: [CPEO-MEF] Beryllium toxicity
Prev by Thread: [CPEO-MEF] Tritium gas release at Anniston Depot (AL)|
Next by Thread: [CPEO-MEF] Beryllium toxicity