|From:||Lenny Siegel <firstname.lastname@example.org>|
|Date:||17 Feb 2007 01:38:58 -0000|
|Subject:||[CPEO-MEF] South Carolina takings legislation|
Governments would lose under takings legislation By JEREMY HSIEH Beaufort Gazette (SC) February 16, 2007A state study committee heard about three hours of testimony in Columbia on Thursday -- mostly in opposition -- to legislation that would protect landowners' rights at the expense of local governments' coffers.
Sixteen of about 20 speakers, including representatives of Marine Corps Air Station Beaufort, the Beaufort Regional Chamber of Commerce and the Town of Hilton Head Island, argued against so-called regulatory takings legislation, said Paula Benson, staff counsel for the state Senate's Judiciary Committee.
As outlined in a House bill introduced last year, landowners would be paid for property value losses caused by county or municipal actions. Advocates say the takings legislation protects property rights; opponents say it would limit land planning and the ability to enforce environmental rules.
... For the entire article, see http://www.beaufortgazette.com/local_news/story/6371417p-5683767c.html -- Lenny Siegel Director, Center for Public Environmental Oversight c/o PSC, 278-A Hope St., Mountain View, CA 94041 Voice: 650/961-8918 or 650/969-1545 Fax: 650/961-8918 <email@example.com> http://www.cpeo.org _______________________________________________ Military mailing list Military@list.cpeo.org http://www.cpeo.org/mailman/listinfo/military
Prev by Date: Re: [CPEO-MEF] "The Politics of Cleanup" - a new report from Energy Communities Alliance|
Next by Date: [CPEO-MEF] Rialto (CA) perchlorate protest
Prev by Thread: [CPEO-MEF] Camp Peary (VA) - the CIA "farm"|
Next by Thread: [CPEO-MEF] Rialto (CA) perchlorate protest