From: | CPEO Moderator <cpeo@cpeo.org> |
Date: | 23 Oct 2002 14:46:16 -0000 |
Reply: | cpeo-military |
Subject: | [CPEO-MEF] Liability concerns loom over Johnston dump |
[Hawaii] Liability concerns loom over Johnston dump By Diana Leone dleone@starbulletin.com Some 800 miles southwest of Honolulu on Johnston Island, a contractor hopes to complete a 25-acre landfill of radioactive rubble by next month. The Defense Threat Reduction Agency, an arm of the U.S. Department of Defense, has pledged that radiation exposure on top of the landfill will meet Environmental Protection Agency standards set for the whole island. But there's a hitch. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, which is scheduled to become the sole caretaker of the island after the military leaves in 2004, doesn't want the liability of the radioactive dump. The Fish and Wildlife Service maintains that "land-filling of plutonium contaminated material on Johnston Island is not appropriate, and that it should be shipped off-island to a radioactive waste facility," Regional Director Anne Badgley wrote in a July 25 letter to the Defense Threat Reduction Agency. Fish and Wildlife officials are still waiting to hear from the defense agency about how to resolve the impasse, said Don Palawski, who oversees Pacific Island refuges, including Johnston, for Fish and Wildlife. The landfill contains 45,000 cubic meters of radioactive material, the last remnants of fallout from two failed 1962 test explosions of nuclear warheads that contaminated Johnston Atoll National Wildlife Refuge. The material is buried under 2 feet of coral. Johnston Island is the largest of four islands and the site of military activity that has coexisted with the refuge. Because nuclear fission never occurred, EPA engineer Ray Saracino likens the plutonium contamination to what people today call a "dirty bomb." It will take 24,000 years before half of the plutonium decomposes to a harmless state, he said. This article can be viewed at: http://starbulletin.com/2002/10/19/news/story10.html ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | |
Prev by Date: [CPEO-MEF] Naval base seen as a potential site for low-cost housing Next by Date: [CPEO-MEF] Sen. Jeffords, Lieberman, and Leahy Oppose DoD Exemptions from Envi | |
Prev by Thread: [CPEO-MEF] Naval base seen as a potential site for low-cost housing Next by Thread: [CPEO-MEF] Sen. Jeffords, Lieberman, and Leahy Oppose DoD Exemptions from Envi |