|Date:||7 Jun 2002 01:08:36 -0000|
|Subject:||[CPEO-MEF] Army, Alaska and environmental exemptions...|
Is this how the Army wants to represent itself to the people andenvironment they serve and protect and it's appreciation towards the communities who support them (not only leaving known contamination to destroy but to add to it without regular cleanup)? These scenarios do not produce 'consensus' building, respect, regard and concern for all involved but does quite the opposite leaving one extremely mistrusting and, understandably, not wanting to sit at a table knowing 'consensus' will not be the goal.
Maybe someone out there has a different 'twist' on this but how is it responsible and accountable action when one is being exempted from being accountable and responsible?
Prev by Date: [CPEO-MEF] House cuts Defense environmental R & D|
Next by Date: Re: [CPEO-MEF] "Sole Source Aquifer" explained
Prev by Thread: [CPEO-MEF] Army, Alaska and environmental exemptions...|
Next by Thread: [CPEO-MEF] "Sole Source Aquifer" explained