1999 CPEO Military List Archive

From: Lenny Siegel <lsiegel@cpeo.org>
Date: Fri, 24 Sep 1999 10:01:30 -0700 (PDT)
Reply: cpeo-military
Subject: Re: BEC replacement questioned at Moffett
 
[This came in from a government employee at another military base:]

Civil Service regulations protect those with longevity and seniority,
just
as any good union shop would do.  Unfortunately, most true environmental
professionals haven't much seniority because the field grew up in
government
service in the past 10-15 years.  Converted civil engineers,
occupational
health types, and water treatment plant operators have the points to
survive
reduction-in-force actions.  Environmental scientists and engineers
don't.
In the future it will not be uncommon to see dedicated, committed,
qualified
environmental folks displaced by older workers from "related"
specialties
who must learn the processes.

One possible way around the RIF is to create TERM positions -- which are
civil service employment contracts for a specified period and which do
not
necessarily become dominoes in a RIF action.  But there are minuses for
the
employees in that situation.

This issue may be an area for dialog between the citizens, elected
officials, and the government bureaucracy.  I've noted that one of the
big
complaints in cleanup sites is the turnover in government personnel...
Hope
this insight is useful to you...

-- 


Lenny Siegel
Director, Center for Public Environmental Oversight
c/o PSC, 222B View St., Mountain View, CA 94041
Voice: 650/961-8918 or 650/969-1545
Fax: 650/968-1126
lsiegel@cpeo.org
http://www.cpeo.org



  References
  Prev by Date: BEC replacement questioned at Moffett
Next by Date: Monitoring wells
  Prev by Thread: BEC replacement questioned at Moffett
Next by Thread: Monitoring wells

CPEO Home
CPEO Lists
Author Index
Date Index
Thread Index