From: | Marylia Kelley <marylia@igc.org> |
Date: | Tue, 16 Sep 1997 14:27:12 -0700 (PDT) |
Reply: | cpeo-military |
Subject: | Funding Lost for Health Study |
Hi. This story about funding problems for the public health assessment at Livermore Lab reflects what is going on not only here in California but also at other sites in the DOE nuclear weapons complex. Moreover, this has potential future implications for every Superfund site in the country. State Agency Loses Funding for Livermore Lab Public Health Study by Stephanie Ericson from Tri-Valley CAREs' September 1997 newsletter, Citizen's Watch A California state health research team will end its scientific participation on October 1 in an investigation of LLNL health effects on the community unless last-minute funding is committed from its partner federal health agency. "The California Department of Health Services (CDHS) has established an on-going relationship with the community," said Pat Sutton, health researcher and member of a community advisory board, or "site team" for the investigation. "And over the years it has also developed a technical understanding of the Livermore Lab, that by its nature cannot be duplicated by a federal agency 3000 miles away." CDHS began the public health assessment of LLNL last fall with the Agency for Toxic Substance and Disease Registry (ATSDR), the federal agency mandated by Congress to conduct public health assessments (PHAs) at Superfund sites. It was the first state-federal public health partnership at a DOE site. But DOE has not yet acted on a request from ATSDR for FY 1998 funds to continue the work. "Without any guarantees of funding, I cannot commit staff time to continuing our scientific research on the public health assessment," said Marilyn Underwood, lead researcher in the CDHS team. Less than $10,000 a month would keep CDHS involved until DOE-Oakland decided how much it will allocate to the PHA. ATSDR plans to continue the work from its Atlanta headquarters, anticipating DOE will eventually come through with enough money for their staff. The budget bottleneck has occurred because DOE, which funds ATSDR's health research at DOE sites, transferred fiscal responsibility for the project from its Washington, DC headquarters to the Oakland Operations regional office without providing the necessary funds. Other DOE sites around the country, such as Hanford, Washington, are similarly affected. However, difficulty in obtaining timely and adequate funds from DOE is nothing new to ATSDR. Over the last three years DOE headquarters has cut public health funding by sixty percent nationwide, said ATSDR official Joe Hughart, undermining the agency's ability to meet public health goals set by Congress in 1989. "We're past muscle and we're into bone," Hughart said of the DOE cuts. "We'll be amputating limbs next." Nevertheless, ATSDR lead researcher on the project Brenda Edmonds said ATSDR is committed to continuing the PHA and is optimistic about its progress. She noted that a major hurdle in acquiring voluminous data from the laboratory was recently resolved, allowing the technical aspects of the project to "flow more smoothly." Underwood said that if CDHS were able to continue its work with ATSDR, "we would be able to complement Edmonds' work in Atlanta by doing things that she wouldn't be able to do from there." As an example, she explained that at another site, CDHS assisted ATSDR by verifying whether drinking wells were still in use. Her agency also has greater familiarity with local and state information resources. "The residents of Livermore have waited long enough for answers about the effects of the Laboratory's activities on their environment," said Livermore city council candidate Michael Ferrucci, another site team member. "We should urge our Mayor to lobby for the continued involvement of the CDHS in this very important public health assessment." He and other site team community representatives intend to urge ATSDR and DOE to make a commitment to keep CDHS on the project as well. At the last public meeting of the site team, last July, public interest in the health assessment drew a standing room only crowd in the medium-sized meeting room. "If the appropriate agencies were aware of the high level of community interest in the assessment, they might reconsider cutting out CDHS involvement," Ferrucci said. Send ATSDR and DOE a message - public health matters. To register your concern, write to the following people. Ask them to make a commitment NOW to fund continued California Department of Health Services participation. David Satcher, M.D. Director, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Administrator, Agency for Toxic Substance and Disease Registry Atlanta, GA 30333 Dr. Tara O'Toole Assistant Secretary of Energy - Environment Safety and Health Department of Energy 1000 Independence Ave., SW Washington, DC 20585 Marylia Kelley Tri-Valley CAREs * 5720 East Ave. #116 * Livermore, CA 94550 Ph: (510) 443-7148 * Fx: (510) 443-0177 | |
Prev by Date: NARAB Next by Date: WHY HARDWOOD RANGE EXPANSION IS STUPID! | |
Prev by Thread: Re: NARAB Next by Thread: WHY HARDWOOD RANGE EXPANSION IS STUPID! |