2006 CPEO Installation Reuse Forum Archive

From: Lenny Siegel <lsiegel@cpeo.org>
Date: 8 Aug 2006 01:27:17 -0000
Reply: cpeo-irf
Subject: [CPEO-IRF] Concord (CA) contamination
 
Chemicals used long ago hinder building at naval station today

By Ryan Huff
CONTRA COSTA TIMES
August 7, 2006	

When sailors needed to get rid of napalm, oil and grenades at the Concord Naval Weapons Station after World War II, they had a simple solution: Just dig a hole and have a bonfire.

Sixty years later, the hangover for these toxic practices is becoming clear as the city of Concord tries to redevelop a base laced with harmful contaminants that can lead to cancer and other diseases.

A recent Navy report details the dangers of nine contaminated sites in the base's southern inland area, which Congress shut down last year and where the city might approve thousands of homes.

The cleanup, to prepare one of the East Bay's last chunks of land available for development, could take nine years and cost the Navy $40 million.

...

For the entire article, see
http://www.contracostatimes.com/mld/cctimes/news/local/states/california/15216654.htm

--
Lenny Siegel
Director, Center for Public Environmental Oversight
c/o PSC, 278-A Hope St., Mountain View, CA 94041
Voice: 650/961-8918 or 650/969-1545
Fax: 650/961-8918
http://www.cpeo.org
_______________________________________________
Installation_Reuse_Forum mailing list
Installation_Reuse_Forum@list.cpeo.org
http://www.cpeo.org/mailman/listinfo/installation_reuse_forum

  Prev by Date: [CPEO-IRF] Brunswick (ME) cleanup update
Next by Date: [CPEO-IRF] Oklahoma Guard update
  Prev by Thread: [CPEO-IRF] Brunswick (ME) cleanup update
Next by Thread: [CPEO-IRF] Oklahoma Guard update

CPEO Home
CPEO Lists
Author Index
Date Index
Thread Index