2005 CPEO Installation Reuse Forum Archive

From: lsiegel@cpeo.org
Date: 26 Oct 2005 00:10:54 -0000
Reply: cpeo-irf
Subject: [CPEO-IRF] Moffett Field (CA) Hangar One solar proposal impractical
 
Solar plan for hangar deemed impractical
SHADED BUILDING WOULD NEED COSTLY PANELS

By Jessica Portner
San Jose Mercury News (CA)
October 25, 2005

NASA officials said Monday they were disappointed that their vision to
wrap Moffett Field's historic Hangar One with a solar-paneled skin that
would generate power for thousands of homes seems doomed.

The angle of the 200-foot-high landmark that once housed a dirigible
means the Mountain View icon would be partially shaded, and the special
panels required to coat it would be too expensive, according the only
company that bid on the project to turn the hangar into the largest
solar-powered building in the state.

"It's disappointing," said Sandy Olliges, NASA's director of
environmental safety and mission assurance. "We just thought we would
try it and see what happens. It's not worth anybody's while to do it."

...

For the entire article, see
http://www.mercurynews.com/mld/mercurynews/living/health/12990619.htm

-- 


Lenny Siegel
Director, Center for Public Environmental Oversight
c/o PSC, 278-A Hope St., Mountain View, CA 94041
Voice: 650/961-8918 or 650/969-1545
Fax: 650/961-8918
<lsiegel@cpeo.org>
http://www.cpeo.org
_______________________________________________
Installation_Reuse_Forum mailing list
Installation_Reuse_Forum@list.cpeo.org
http://www.cpeo.org/mailman/listinfo/installation_reuse_forum

  Prev by Date: [CPEO-IRF] Private sector on Ft. Monmouth reuse authority
Next by Date: [CPEO-IRF] Senate Committee stalls refinery proposal
  Prev by Thread: [CPEO-IRF] Private sector on Ft. Monmouth reuse authority
Next by Thread: [CPEO-IRF] Senate Committee stalls refinery proposal

CPEO Home
CPEO Lists
Author Index
Date Index
Thread Index