2015 CPEO Brownfields List Archive

From: Lenny Siegel <lsiegel@cpeo.org>
Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2015 20:13:16 -0700 (PDT)
Reply: cpeo-brownfields
Subject: [CPEO-BIF] Vapor Intrusion articles featured in U.S. EPA's Technology News and Trends: October 2015
 
To view this on the web, go to https://clu-in.org/products/newsltrs/tnandt/view_new.cfm?issue=0815.cfm


Technology News & Trends | A Quarterly Newsletter
Summer 2015 | Issue 70
Is this email not displaying correctly?
View current issue in your browser.

This issue of Technology News & Trends highlights investigation and mitigation of vapor intrusion at or near contaminated sites, with a focus on summarizing how vapor intrusion was addressed at three sites where response actions are underway. Vapor intrusion is the general term given to migration of hazardous vapors from any subsurface vapor source, such as contaminated soil or groundwater, through the soil and into an overlying building or structure. A wide variety of chemical contaminants can give off vapors, which can migrate towards and enter buildings or other enclosed spaces. These vapors can enter buildings through cracks in basements and foundations, as well as through conduits and other openings in the building envelope. Vapor intrusion is a potential human exposure pathway — a way that people may come into contact with hazardous vapors while performing their day-to-day indoor activities. Depending upon building- and site-specific circumstances, indoor concentrations of chemical vapors arising from the vapor intrusion pathway may threaten human health or safety. When human health or safety is threatened by vapor intrusion, response action is warranted.

EPA collaborates with potentially affected stakeholders and with state agencies when evaluating potential vapor intrusion associated with contaminated sites under federal jurisdiction. Some states also maintain their own vapor intrusion programs that may include tailored guidelines, such as the new North Carolina Division of Waste Management Vapor Intrusion Guidance or the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Vapor Intrusion Guidance.

Key Elements of the Conceptual Model of Soil Vapor Intrusion
Key Elements of the Conceptual Model of Soil Vapor Intrusion

Source: OSWER Technical Guide for Assessing and Mitigating the
Vapor Intrusion Pathway from Subsurface Vapor Sources to Indoor Air
June 2015

Featured Articles

Vapor Intrusion Associated with Multiple Contaminant Sources

Several systems have been used to remediate soil and groundwater at the Motorola, Inc. 52nd Street Plant Superfund site in Phoenix, Arizona, over the past 20 years. In 2011, a study was initiated to evaluate the potential for vapor intrusion in nearby neighborhoods and determine the need for mitigation. More recently, EPA used a mobile laboratory to confirm the findings and determine likelihood for vapor intrusion in other neighborhoods. Vapor intrusion mitigation systems have been installed at 16 residences, to date.

Evaluation of Vapor Intrusion in Complex Geologic Setting

Remediation of the Crossley Farm Superfund site in Berks County, Pennsylvania, involves an adaptive management approach relying on multiple lines of evidence in decisions regarding the need for residential vapor intrusion mitigation systems. The site's location in a geologically complex area that includes fractured bedrock at significant depths presents challenges to defining the contaminant plume. Evaluation of the associated vapor intrusion is further challenged by numerous springs that potentially discharge shallow contaminated groundwater.

Petroleum Vapor Intrusion Assessment: Multiple Lines of Evidence Lead to Mitigation at Utah Gasoline Fueling Station

Multiple lines of evidence were used at the Hoagies Petro Mart V site in Farr West, Utah, to determine whether petroleum vapor intrusion was occurring in the convenience store above a gasoline plume. The Utah Department of Environmental Quality's investigation included an evaluation of soil and groundwater samples, sub-slab soil vapor, ambient air, and indoor air for volatile compounds from March 2013 to July 2015. Presence of contaminants at concentrations that exceed risk-based screening levels led to the decision to implement both an immediate mitigation measure ? installation of an indoor air carbon filter treatment system ? and a longer-term mitigation and source removal plan.

Resources

New EPA Guidance: OSWER Technical Guide for Assessing and Mitigating the Vapor Intrusion Pathway from Subsurface Vapor Sources to Indoor Air

EPA's June 2015 final vapor intrusion guide (OSWER publication 9200.2-154) presents current technical recommendations of the EPA for assessing and responding to vapor intrusion. The guide clarifies topics such as weighing multiple lines of evidence; statutory authorities for preemptive mitigation or other early actions; options for mitigation systems (including their operation, maintenance and monitoring); termination of response actions; and the role of institutional controls in final cleanup plans when subsurface vapor sources are present. The guide is intended for use at any site (and any building or structure on a site) being evaluated by EPA pursuant to the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) or the corrective action provisions of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA), EPA's brownfield grantees, or state agencies acting pursuant to CERCLA or an authorized RCRA corrective action program where vapor intrusion may be of potential concern. The guide pertains to all of the various vapor-forming chemicals that may occur as subsurface contaminants at these sites, which include many non-chlorinated compounds (petroleum hydrocarbons, for example) and compounds that are not used as solvents. One of the main purposes of this guide is to promote national consistency in assessing the vapor intrusion pathway at these sites.

New EPA Guidance: Technical Guide for Addressing Petroleum Vapor Intrusion at Leaking Underground Storage Tank Sites

EPA's June 2015 petroleum vapor intrusion guide (EPA 510-R-15-001) focuses on releases of petroleum-based fuels, including petroleum hydrocarbon (PHC) and non-PHC fuel additives, from underground storage tanks (USTs) regulated under Subtitle I of the Solid Waste Disposal Act of 1984, which are typically located at gas stations. The guide may also be helpful when addressing petroleum contamination at comparable non-UST sites. Supporting technical information in the guide addresses topics such as light non-aqueous phase liquid, seasonal and weather effects and vapor intrusion attenuation factors.

New Tool: Vapor Intrusion Screening Level (VISL) Calculator

The Vapor Intrusion Screening Level (VISL) Calculator is a technical resource developed by EPA that: (1) identifies chemicals considered to be typically vapor-forming and known to pose a potential cancer risk or noncancer hazard through the inhalation pathway; (2) provides generally recommended screening-level concentrations for groundwater, near-source soil gas (exterior to buildings), sub-slab soil gas, and indoor air based on default exposure scenarios and default risk management benchmarks; and (3) facilitates calculation of site-specific screening levels and candidate cleanup levels based on user-defined target risk levels, exposure scenarios, and semi-site-specific or site-specific attenuation factors. The VISL Calculator is an MS Excel workbook that was first published online in 2012. It has been updated periodically as new toxicity information became available and was recently updated to coincide with release of the OSWER Technical Guide. To download the spreadsheet calculator, visit EPA's online compendium of technical information.

EPA Website: Vapor Intrusion

EPA's Vapor Intrusion website is a resource for key information on vapor intrusion for both the general public and environmental professionals. The website contains basic information about vapor intrusion, technical and policy documents, tools and other resources to support vapor intrusion investigations. It also provides access to technical reports focused on topics such as conceptual model scenarios for the vapor intrusion pathway and mitigation approaches for vapor intrusion.

NIEHS Superfund Research Program Briefs: Measuring Vapor Intrusion to Estimate Underground Contamination; Developments toward Low-Cost, Unattended Vapor Intrusion Monitoring

The National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS) Superfund Research Program funds university-based multidisciplinary research on human health and environmental issues related to hazardous substances. The central goal of the program is to understand and break the link between chemical exposure and disease. Measuring Vapor Intrusion to Estimate Underground Contamination (Research Brief 238) describes process models developed by Brown University researchers to predict the concentrations of vapors that enter indoor environments. Developments toward Low-Cost, Unattended Vapor Intrusion Monitoring(Research Brief 236) describes an inexpensive vapor intrusion monitoring system developed by NIEHS Superfund Research Program-funded scientists from the chemical sensor company Seacoast Science.

ESTCP Demonstration Projects: Use of Compound-Specific Stable Isotope Analysis to Distinguish Between Vapor Intrusion and Indoor Sources of VOCs; Use of On-Site GC/MS Analysis to Distinguish between Vapor Intrusion and Indoor Sources of VOCs

Two projects on distinguishing vapor intrusion from indoor sources of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) merited the Environmental Security Technology Certification Program (ESTCP) 2014 Project-of-The-Year Award for Environmental Restoration. Use of Compound-Specific Stable Isotope Analysis to Distinguish Between Vapor Intrusion and Indoor Sources of VOCs (ER-201025) demonstrated use of a step-by-step protocol that can provide an independent line of evidence to determine whether or not buildings are impacted by VOCs. Use of On-Site GC/MS Analysis to Distinguish between Vapor Intrusion and Indoor Sources of VOCs(ER-201119) validated a step-wise investigation procedure using portable, commercially available gas chromatograph/mass spectrometer analysis and real-time decision making to distinguish between vapor intrusion and indoor sources of VOCs.


--

Lenny Siegel
Executive Director, Center for Public Environmental Oversight
a project of the Pacific Studies Center
278-A Hope Street
Mountain View, CA 94041
Voice: 650-961-8918 or 650-969-1545
Fax: 650-961-8918

_______________________________________________
Brownfields mailing list
Brownfields@lists.cpeo.org
http://lists.cpeo.org/listinfo.cgi/brownfields-cpeo.org
  Prev by Date: [CPEO-BIF] "Public health campus proposed for former Performance Paper Inc. land, " Kalamazoo, Michigan
Next by Date: [CPEO-BIF] TCE sampling at Ithaca Gun Factory, Ithaca, New York
  Prev by Thread: [CPEO-BIF] "Public health campus proposed for former Performance Paper Inc. land, " Kalamazoo, Michigan
Next by Thread: [CPEO-BIF] TCE sampling at Ithaca Gun Factory, Ithaca, New York

CPEO Home
CPEO Lists
Author Index
Date Index
Thread Index